Open Access at the MDC 2014

Beginning in early 2014 I organised a short series of talks at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC). It was a no-budget grassroots action, on behalf of a small group of open science enthusiasts from the campus. Our target audience was researchers from the campus and further afield, hoping to spark a wider discussion on issues around open science and ultimately inspire a process of change at our institutions.

Several of us behind the project had been very inspired by the Berlin 11 Satellite Conference for Students and Early Career Researchers organised by Nick Shockley of the Right to Research Coalition held in November 2013 in Berlin, which later grew to become OpenCon.

Scientific-Publishing

The talks series, Scientific Publishing: How to fix a broken system, highlights the challenges facing the traditional model of scientific publishing, the changes already being brought into play, and potential future directions – everything you need to know about a publishing industry in transition. We hope to bring you speakers on the latest topics and debates around open access, open science, impact factors and more.

04.04.2014
Do we have to waste so much time with our publications?
Prof Björn Brembs
University of Regensburg

11.03.2014
Article-Level Metrics at the Public Library of Science (PLOS)
Martin Fenner
Public Library of Science (PLOS)

10.02.2014
ScienceOpen: Rethinking Scientific Publishing – Open Access and Public Post-Publication
Dr Sebastian Alers (Senior Editor), Dr Stephanie Dawson (CEO), Tibor Tscheke (CFO/CTO and Founder)
ScienceOpen

One of the outcomes of the series was an invitation to address the MDC scientific council (the meeting of all 70+ MDC group leaders) in April 2014. I took the opportunity to talk about open access in general, as well as poor usage of the MDC publication repository for self-archiving full-text publications, presenting this analysis of the data:

MDC OA

It shows how, despite regular request emails from the MDC library to authors of papers eligible for ‘green route’ open access / self-archiving in the repository (since 2010), the manuscript submission rate was very poor.
(Articles published through gold or hybrid open access routes were automatically archived by the library.)

It became clear that there was a lot of confusion about the different approaches to open access and often a real lack of awareness. Only those PIs with EU funding were very familiar with the issues thanks to the mandates for open access associated with those funding streams.

The talk itself led to an immediate uptick in submissions to the repository, which was gratifying. But to encourage a sustainable change in behaviour a project was started to develop and improve information about the options for open access publishing from the library via their webpages and email communications, as well as raising questions about the interoperability of the MDC repository. An MDC open science representative was subsequently appointed, but I remained involved as an unofficial advisor and advocate (Article, “An open access strategy for Berlin“) and continue to be active in the grassroots open science movement.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Further Projects